this isn't bullet.Armor increased a pretty much.Characteristics is same as it was in ArmA1 with 9mm parabellum.But in Arma1 it's kills with one shot instead five. :(

Some example of this in code(Arma1):

		class HitHead {
			armor = 0.7;
			material = -1;
			name = "head_hit";
			passThrough = true;
		};
		
		class HitBody {
			armor = 0.8;
			material = -1;
			name = "body";
			passThrough = true;
		};
		
		class HitHands {
			armor = 0.5;
			material = -1;
			name = "hands";
			passThrough = true;
		};
		
		class HitLegs {
			armor = 0.5;
			material = -1;
			name = "legs";
			passThrough = true;
		};

And now ArmA3:

		class HitPoints {
			class HitHead {
				armor = 0.7*2.5;
				material = -1;
				name = "head";
				passThrough = 1.0;
				radius = 0.09;
				explosionShielding = 0.3;
			};
			
			class HitBody {
				armor = 0.8*10;
				material = -1;
				name = "body";
				passThrough = 0.8;
				radius = 0.12;
				explosionShielding = 0.8;
				visual = "injury_body";
			};
			
			class HitHands {
				armor = 0.5*5;
				material = -1;
				name = "hands";
				passThrough = 0.5;
				radius = 0.06;
				explosionShielding = 0.8;
				visual = "injury_hands";
			};
			
			class HitLegs {
				armor = 0.5*5;
				material = -1;
				name = "legs";
				passThrough = 0.25;
				radius = 0.08;
				explosionShielding = 1;
				visual = "injury_legs";
			};
		};

This is about performance,about range,well depend what weapon you use,if this is pistol - range wouldn't be greater that ~25 meters(effective).For SMG - 50-100,but not more.Oh... if there will be 5.7 weapons...

Well 6.5 is almost same as 7.62 in case of damage.But looks lighter.
I think it will matter if default ammo will be 5.56/7.62 like.
But anyway wote up.Current arsenal is very weak to me.ArmA2 had moar weapons AFAIK.

@DarkWanderer.
In game this isn't work.5.56 have 8 points of damage,6.5 - 10,7.62 - 12 :)
Well,at least in config.And also any of them have almost same ballistic.
And also 6.5 in game isn't grendel.This is fictional caseless ammo.

But they should.Even irons like on SOS,but they should be.Almost all advanced(Not 80th years tech) sights have backup sights.This is for realism sake.
As I said - Nightstalker have backup iron.NVS doesn't.But this is almost same models.About TWS,well imagene like that.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/FELIN-openphotonet_PICT6047.jpg

Already created,check ArmA2 Czech Army DLC.

Then I will use howitzer as main battle tank/fighting vehicle,because they can do this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WY9QpUpRDo&feature=youtu.be

@AD2001 знаешь в чём большой плюс русского языка?Я могу сказать,что ты хуй,и ты этого не поймёш это. Попытка перевести через Google Translate,к ФСБ тебе вышлет отряд боевых медведей. :)

Well,on topic,bump up and vote up.It was in ACE mod for ArmA2.

Croatia huh?
Well as I said just send an squad of assault bears to Croatia. :)

Agree,there is missing some major classes of weapons and vehicles like:
1)Medium Machineguns
2)Light ATs(Lighter that NLAW in combat layout)
3)Shotguns
4)Weapon like XM-25(Yes,we saw screenshot),M32 another multishot grenade launchers.
5)Nothing like light vehicles,like S-ATV IRL.This heavier that quad ATV,but lighter that MRAP.
6)heavy aviation,like MV22 at all sides.Only Mohawk belong to Green army.
7)Mobile Arty and mortars.

Well,to much to do.I'm hope that's not release vehicles,just for future pre-release update.

5.56 have around 5 points of damage,6.5 - 10,7.62 - 12.
You really sure that this bullet underpowered?

Future warfare,all sides are pretty strong.Well BLUFOR strong in air(Better choppers),OPFOR strong at ground(Better vehicles),Green army is weaker side(yet),but for old gen resistance they're fine.
Diffirence between weapon - not actually makes disbalance,well except my ticket about NLAW and RPG(In configs NLAW should work up to 600 meter,but actual range is ~1km*(For player,AI uses it correct),also for realism sake - RPG shall shoot up to 700 meters).

http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=12005

Well,I'm for balance,but not like COD,BF etc,where every weapon/vehicle 99% same.Balance is cool,but they should be assymetrical.Well one of reasons,why I don't play ArmA2 OA - heavy disbalance,even in infantry combat.If you wanna disbalance - you can create it in missions.Create a chopper,and village,full of AI infantry,and nobody will worry about it.But if such scenario will be PvP,well... ArmA3 would be forgotten soon.

I didn't vote,but Im just bump up your ticket.

Well ACE will add flashbangs.
Not even sure that military use it,but anyway voteup.

Not for modern military,but cool feature.
Teargas is an just a toy for military,mostly uses by police,some chemical weapon will be better,but eh,for modern combat UN banned this kind of weapon,same as flamethrowers.

Well I saw in configs TacVest with Police sign in.But they was written in Greek language.And yes dublicate.

@InstaGoat,they uses Tandem and FAE warhead - PG32V is tandem,TBG32 - isn't tandem,this is FAE munition.FAE shell is a small... -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermobaric_weapon
well IRL test doens't penetrate any up armored vehicle.But well destroy unarmored vehicles like trucks or old gen HMMWV.Well - current MRAPs looks enough armored.Well,actually agree with another thing - both of this weapon are able to destroy tanks,but maximum that they can do - wheeled APCs or tracked by 2-4 shots.

And simple one:
1)This is tandem AT for RPG29(As you said as examle),they are penetrate M1A2 armor - http://militaryrussia.ru/i/284/439/ivRIz.jpg
2)And this is FAE for RPG29,in Russia this kind of weapon called reactive flamethrower - http://militaryrussia.ru/i/284/439/t22Ug.jpg

@ProGamer well,try to read,before write.With AI this weapon works fine,as they should,but in player hands they are pretty much disbalanced.And I don't care your opinion.upvote,downvote,who cares...

@ProGamer,I don't care communuty opinion,matter only results.

Path of codes
CfgAmmo:
M_NLAW_AT_F{
....
MaxControlRange = 600; After range of 600 meters they fly like unguided.One of my evidence,that I'm right.
....
TimeToLife = 5.6; How much time missile exist after launch,as result they may destroy targets as unguided rocket at distance up to 1km.If need proof,I can record video.This value should be change to blow up missile at range 600-650 meters.
....
};
R_PG32V_F{
maxSpeed = 140 if in m/s - this is fine
thrust = 0.01 thrust speed small,but in short time,init speed in CfgMagazines.This value responsable for ballistic,and they feeling like RPG7,not like RPG32.I think if increase it to 140 and....
thrustTime = 0.01//increase it al least a bit more that 1 second to allow to fly 160 meters directly.I other aspects - ballistic would not changes,no need to create new reticle.

If somebody doesn't trust - press ctrl+G in editor,ald lurk this(Don't forget about dev version).
};
R_TBG32V_F{
hit = 100 direct hit damage is to high,they destroy MRAPs via 1 hit.This vehicles have enough armor to save the vehicle.20-30 will be fine,they shall destroy Zamak,and shall not destroy MRAPs and HEMTT.
indirectHit = 50to much anyway should be same value as dirrect hit,maybe a bit smaller.
indirectHitRange =5Lethal range IRL,nobody will survive,but will be great to increase damage range,if they're exist.
};
CfgWeapons:
launch_NLAW_F{
aiRateOfFireDistance = 600; Max distance that AI will engage targets.Another evidence,that I'm right:)
};

Change some configs values isn't nessesary thing?
Im not even ask for write huge script,just change lifetime to 2.7(As result they're blow up,if target at longer distance,that 600 meters) seconds of missile and tweak speeds for RPG.Watch video below.

Im not talking about able to disposable or not and I'm absolutely not interesting PvE in ArmA3.Im play only PvP missions.Mostly hardocore without respawn.
Players usually uses both weapons.Read post above,looks like you're missunderstand some points:

"Well read a ticket.Im talking only about balance between PCML and RPG.Lets see to default layout - BLUE Riflaman(AT) have PCML and 3 missiles.RED Rifleman AT have RPG42 and 3 Rockets.Blue can hit 3 MRAPs at distance up to 1km,even if they move.Red can do this only at 500 meters,also they should have very luck and high skill to do this,especially at moving targets."

@micovery - thats why exist this tracket.
Same weapon,well... an NATO soldier with RPG32,or CSAT with PCML...

Also I saw PCML configs - AI will never uses NLAW at distances more that 600 meters.But player can do this.

@ProGamer - the sides was balanced in ArmA1 well.
In ArmA3 factions became well balanced "with strong and weak sides".RAH-99 better that Mi48,while BTR-K better that IFV-6c.

Well read a ticket.Im talking only about balance between PCML and RPG.Lets see to default layout - BLUE Riflaman(AT) have PCML and 3 missiles.RED Rifleman AT have RPG42 and 3 Rockets.Blue can hit 3 MRAPs at distance up to 1km,even if they move.Red can do this only at 500 meters,also they should have very luck and high skill to do this,especially at moving targets.
For realism sake - NLAW are disposable,soldier can handle more that one rocket and distance is a lot smaller,that currently in game.RPG is shooting with RPG7 ballistic,RPG32 ballistic is a diffirent,they have pretty long direct hit distance.

@InstaGoat I was tweak this RPGs(Mostly CfgAmmo) before well look at video
Start speed is 140 meters per second(504km/h) direct hit is around 160 meters,effective range is up to 700 meters,also much more reticle much more precise that current in DEV version.But in DEV version this isn't work,cuz changed memory point in RPGs model.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ldit67Bj9Lo

@twistking - http://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_NLAW_RB57_Cutaway_lg.gif
See that orange barrel on the front side?This is warhead.They're directed to the bottom.Looks like they hit target always on top.

@ProGamer - ArmA1 was well balanced.And also not every scenario/MP mission have air support.Not every missions can even have ground vehicles,only infantry.Sometimes they are just simply useless(example - chopper/APC in fog).Well unlike ArmA2OA,where BLUEFOR have both air and ground superiority now they are weak at ground and strong in air.

@Byku - well I think so not only for realism.Guided at 1km and unguided at 500m it's not so good.

@twistking - I doesn't like "Magic" guidance,but this is best possible way for ArmA.Real NLAW should hit target on the top,not on the side.Also real NLAW are disposable.Best possible way for them - reduce distance.Well I have no idea,how to create inertional guidance.They also should be disposable,but this is another story...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-MXqI7bYkc&feature=player_embedded#at=271

@ProGamer - Yes,current RPG have ballistics like on RPG7.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mP6MwwiMjFs
As you can see some targets was hit with angles,closer to direct hit.

And don't forget - war is unfair,game should be fair.You playing the game,diffirent that others mainstream,but still game.Looks like you forget it.Balance should be.Well NATO have air superiority,CSAT have ground - thats one of examples of balance.

http://images.eurogamer.net/assets/articles//a/1/3/8/4/3/2/1/ss_preview_Arma3_screeenshot_EGcz_06.jpg.jpg?slideshow=true

When you stay a lot of time underwater your engine become broken.
Actually some tanks may submerge and move underwater using special devices or for short time may without them.But I prefer to instant engine damaga to red in this situations.

http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=11621

Looks like every one want it.

Usually if you injured that much that you can't walk - you can not do that a few week to all rest your life.
Healing isn't realistic,same as leg ingures,but makes game uncomfortable,very slow walking as it now is a best possible way IMO.

Whatever,still not assighned.Whatever what ticket,but looks like no one of them haven't seen by devs.

@AD2001
Still not assighned,this means they're useless.

Well in combat situation I'll prefer to be inside small vehicle,that inside large.
In case of realism they must be large,but look at game in general,futuristic red faction flying on KA50/Mi28/Mi24 hybrid chopper,that doesn't exist in real life.
Same with this HAPC,not sure that so much important,but not critical.There is much more critical points in game IMO,that still not fixed.
Like non-ajustable rocket launchers,lack of driver/gunner/commander interior APCs,new 3d scopes works with NVGs etc.

edit:just forget - bipod :)

InstaGoat - many modern vehicles have such system,even old soviet BMP2 created in 70ths years.This isn't a bug,just change ammo from menu is much habitual to me.

RPG fire,how its now,and how its should be.
Rocket velocity - 140 meters per second,as in real RPG32.Yet without reticle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ldit67Bj9Lo

I thing you misunderstood me.Or may be just a pretty fat troll. :)

Yes this work well,they shoot,they didn't crush the game etc etc.This is minimal for every game.
But look from another way - obviously evere weapon(Rifle,AT,SMG whatever) have:
1)Reticle or ajustable sight if ammo is unguided.
2)"Ready to fire" indicator if they are guided,especially if "Fire and Forgot".

Find me any kind of system,that didn't have that.Lack of details is more disadvantage of the game,that their good side.

I write some vids to explain,what diffirence between Elite and Regular difficulty and how usefull weapon there.
Regular(PCML have "Indicator" as well as Titan)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHCQtvb-Z0g
Elite(PCML didn't have,Titan have)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDznwqhIOO4

Well,to fat buggy,to fat...

Well look AT Titan sight,then PCML/RPG,then again on Titan.
Didn't you see diffirence?
If you're really play on elite - you should know,what I mean.

@Raoul1234
Did you ever try to use PCML or RPG on elite difficuly?

AD2001:
1)Switch into elite(Auto-guidence must be switch off).
2)Take RPG on PCML
3)Try to lock-on a target.
4)Try to tell me are target locked on or not?And if you under fire?
5)....
6)Butthurt

But if you play domination only - and takes in one side PCML,in back - CarryAll Backpack,in another - M320 and in hands you have an pistol.And also does everything with 3th person and helpers like frame frendlies,lock-on frames.Of course this isn't nessesary and everything are fine.

Missle can be locked,but you actually doesn't feel it.With Titan - this thing are easier,but AT missile overpowered(Can shoot from Killfarm hill to airfield and kill APC in one shot),AP - weaks even that PCML.

Iran already have M16.But Bull-pup version.)
On topic - can't say,that it would be good for 2035 year.IMO this is dinosaurus today.They stays since 1985 year(M16A2),in 1990 - just added rail on top(M16A4),didn't even talk about A1 and elder versions.
Another reason - since 10 years that I play games,almost every shooter have M16/M4 and AKs.This is an greatest ecxeption ever I seen. :)

Economical side should hurt yours wishes.
Well,forget about money.Everything now is an todays technoligies,forbidden and canceled prototypes,possible futuristic vehicles.

Almost everything is ingame already.
1)Armor - well everything great here.Old 5.56 ammo cannot kill in one shot as much distance as they became useless.Thats why created 6.5 round with small recoil and way better damage power.Same things was in history when assault rifles cames from regular automatic rifles.

2)Sniper Detection system.Well in some case usefull system,in another - makes infantry life much more easier.Im pretty sure,that futuristic snipers could be use thermal camouflage(Currenty BAE test it,but on vehicles).If they will use it - then I agree.

3)HUD - Fully Agree.Helmets and Glasses are useless yet,but models looks like as they interactive HUD.But in reality - you may drop down glasses and helmets and you can't see diffirence.

4)Thermal Googles.Well - thermal scopes is much that enough.I can suggest only one thing - thermal Monocular/Binocular.

Pretty sure,that Marshal will have weak HMG/GMG turret,saw something in 2010 years screens.Also sure,that reds will have something like cannor,or just heavy APC with tank armor.
Cobra's purpose is on Ifrit.
8x8 only - well not sure that needed very much.Why not to put autocannon on 6x6 version.

@ProGamer.Well 2 things - you are troll,or you're just silly.
Only one wat to use optic with NV is a http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v711/clintl/SPR2NV.jpg

This isn't possible to use it with NV googles.Only one thing that you can see uses this method is a blur in sight.

bump

Good idea.

Well RH - this is dev yet.Hope see this in beta,or final.

Yeah,know that ARCO looking like SpecterDR.Well no matter,just make some diversity if it possible.

Wrong.Reticle works well.Usually hard to see targets more that 600 meters.
Of course DEVs can create proper 3D optic,but not every one have high-end PCs to create PIP optic.If you wanna precision hit to target - you need SOS and rangefinder,or just know ditstance to target.

DAGR missile is guided.They have 24 guided missiles.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5z3KncRxV8

VBS2 Lite.Usage of "Fake PIP" is was there.Some vehicles have interior,even tank gunner.Yes they are crude,but they are exist.Imagine that you have such interior with PIP screens in ArmA3.Well guess to late,but anyway...

You also can open/close doors and ramps.

@twistking forbidden means nobody from devs looks or moderators didn't see this ticket.They still not assigned.

And situation isn't so much worse,that you think,regular to ArmA.Create interior for rare vehicles isn't so much easy job,cause lack of references,but IF it will be,will be great.

P.S AD2001 - comments bump this ticket,I'll prefer to much more talking in coments.

bump and voteup.Looks like ticket is forbidden,but still need this feature.

Upvoted.

@Deceiver.ArmA3 confuse me again.Well my looks like my knowledge is not ideal.Maybe because I never looks into the future,and only looking in tomorrow and today.Well my bad.

@Scarecrow.I see also name - Vector.But they called Vermin,right?As I saw - KA-60 "Kasatka" is now translated and called PO-30 "Orca".

Well actully I prefer to this guns will us PDW rounds,like P90 and MP7,that pistol rounds.Age of SMGs in army use is gone far ago.But they still good as police weapon,when their targets usually doesn's wear armor vests.

They uses 9x21mm round.This round doesn't exist in real world.Possible this is AP bullets.Also .45 ACP isn't good for armor penetration.

DEVs tell us about usage of 9mm rounds in this gun.Also - maybe you know a good gun,called Browning Hi-Power?This is clone of Colt 1911,but uses 9mm rounds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6JAehXB8wE
The matter of changes 4 strings,also bump this ticket.
Good for PvP,bad for AI-gunner(Can't say "cease fire",but you always can do manual fire).
class Heli_Attack_02a_base_F : Helicopter_Base_F {

                .......
		weapons[] = {"CMFlareLauncher", "rockets_Skyfire"};
		magazines[] = {"192Rnd_CMFlare_Chaff_Magazine", "38Rnd_80mm_rockets"};
                ......
          class Turrets : Turrets
				weapons[] = {"gatling_30mm","missiles_SCALPEL"};
				magazines[] = {"250Rnd_30mm_APDS_shells","250Rnd_30mm_HE_shells", "8Rnd_LG_scalpel"};

I thing cause usage the by AI.
This is raw tweak,I don't know how AI will use it.

upvoted.

In Dev version - SOS works well now with 6.5 caliber.Now this feedback is pointless.Or not?

@da12thMonkey - this scopes much likely 3.4x and 4x that 12x.

p00d73.Still wrong.
Marksman - trained soldier in squad to shooting at at long ranges like 600-800 meters.They always have much advanced optic,that riflemans(all rest infantry classes) near.This is not sniper,they're not trained enough.

Examples:
1)Russia - АК-74М no optic / SVD PSO-1
2)US(2003 year) - M16A2 or Modern M4 with Aimpoints CompM2 / SDM-R(x4) and M21(x3-x9 afaik)
3)US(Modern) - M4 ACOG x4 and Aimpoints / SAM-R,M21,M14 EBRs all use x3-x9 or x3-x10 or x3-x12 scopes.
4)German army(Modern) - G36A1,G36A2(x4+holosight) / HK417(G28 codename) with x3-x10(Afaik)
5)British army(modern) - SA80(AcogX4+Docter holosight) / L129A1 - Acog x6.

p00d73.Wrong.
SAM-R - Leupold's Mark 4 M3 3-9 x 36 mm MR/T,also simple DMR pre SAM-R concept was called SDM-R.And they was failed AFAIK.
L129A1 - Trijicon ACOG TA648 sight x6 magnification.
Belgian - have no idea,to lazy to lurk.
Austrian - to lazy to lurk.
German - HK417.Same scope as on SAM-R.Also G3SG1,but scope is diffirent.
Soviet - yes,PSO-1,cuz project to create 3-8x scope was failed in well,to lazy to lurk something like 1970th years.

Can you show some prooflinks?I can,if needed.

just upload video.

@Kecske.I thought it was looking worse,but in actually.Well,not so ideal,but not bad.But also better to see something like 8x8 trucks.And futuristic design of Typhoon looking awesome there IMO.

Also - current KAMAZ needs a good wash,they looking so much dirty(Like they wasn't washed at least as 1 year).Also they're looking small to compare to ifrit for example.

bump
http://twower.livejournal.com/1024786.html

Also may suggest MAN truck used by GB army IRL.They was in VBS2 lite AFAIK,no needs to create new model.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8030/7979687108_18e37fbf61_o.jpg

@pops well my english sux,but that was all,what i'll try to say)

.408 round at around 700 meter have more kinetic energy that .50 cal round.Theroretical accuracy is up to 3500 meters,in practice was 3000meters from SVL.
So CheyTac are better,that lynx IRL,idk how it in the game.

Well old style ArmA.In one hand we got realism.In another - comfortable gameplay.In any ArmA i'll stuck in every door,expetionally in ArmA2,where was a lot of interactive buildings.Also sometimes i'll still stuck somewhere,but this rare,that in A2 for example.

@wUFr ifrit is based on real vehicle.His name is Zil Karatel'(Punisher)
http://img11.nnm.ru/a/a/c/0/6/9c54f7c067ca15cffb248689391.jpg

one question - why?
Why you don't like current model?May be this is future modified version,created for "Green_Army_name".
I saw some haters before about "M14 is an US weapon,and made for use" something like that.

bump

NATO now have TRG-20 and TRG-21.Now they uses 5.56
Also DMR must have another kind of 6.5 ammo,heavier,powerful and much more accurate,like MK262 ammo for MK12 SPR.Or uses 7.62.

exist SCAR-H(7.62x51)in CQB version.Complitly not CQB veapon,but they're exist...
also OPFOR uses 6.5 in any rifle too(yet).
For purpose of usage 5.56 NATO have TRG-20,TRG-21.They also better in CQB,cause bullpup are more compact.

Also - exist logistic problems.Easier to carry one type of ammo,that one for rifle,another for DMR,third for LMGs,Forth - for |long continious list|.

About stopping power - well,in CQB this is more important thing,that at distance.Many Police SF uses more 9mm SMGs,because their round have better stopping power..Much more important thing at distance - ballistic characteristics,may be thats why future ammo is an compromise between 5.56x45/5.45x39 and 7.62x39.

@pops.Well Mk12 SPR in arma has beatuful optic.Lack of damage compense with high accuracy and great magnification(in ArmA1 it was best AFAIK).Here it's not work,this is just rifle like MX,but with diffirent 3d model unfortunately.

@pops - changes with MXM are bad IMO.
Of course IRL USA use same caliber DMRs such as SAM-R,but they as well have better optic and matched rounds.
SOS scope not calibrated for small arms,they calibrated for heavy calibers.
There is no sense between MX and MXM.Put HAMR to MX and it will be same as MXM.

Also Tavor now have 5.56 caliber,this is not a bug.The bug is - they uses 6.5mm supperssor