Bohemia, you make a great game, but the mainstream DayZ and Wasteland players and trying to ruin it using the Feedback Tracker. I play ArmA because it is a simulation, I want everything as realistic as possible, this is what ArmA II had that no other games did. I notice through the updates that this game is going through small changes that are only making it closer to a generic FPS. First, The NVGs working with the optics were fine BEFORE you updated it, It is ridiculously hard in real life to line up an NVG tube and an ACOG tube enough to make it even useful not to mention the bloom the reticule would have. Second, the grenade throwing is what its like in a generic FPS, that in many of ours opinion, is a small step in the wrong direction. Learn from history, think about Rainbow 6 and Ghost Recon, they went from realistic to stupid. I'm starting to make a guess that this happens to every game, but please don't allow this to happen to ArmA. I think the real fans and players of ArmA will understand my point as we don't want an amazing series to turn to crap.
I've been reading the Feedback Tracker and some player's think that the game is "Imbalanced" and want BLUFOR and OPFOR to have balanced weapons. Please Don't listen to this, this will only make the game closer to a generic FPS. War is not about balance, it's about superiority. I'm just a player who wants to keep this amazing series a Simulation, even the wikipedia page for it says its a "Open World Tactical Shooter", doesn't sound like a Simulation game.