downvoted cause dup #0002714

i am not even gonna bother in making one until BIS add a more realistic flight phyiscs, like the TOH ones, WICH AS I REMEMBER WE WERE PROMISED WE WOULD HAVE THEM.......

Fireball, this ticket while "fixed" still has problems, the helicopter effect when being hit by an AA its still wrong

Thank you dennis, i hope BIS open their eyes and actually look after people with military experience when making war sims instead of using their instincts

so sad than looking at past BIS dev records its likely that they will do the cheap thing (i blame them for running out of resources after developing 4 games at the same time being a small indie dev company)

Frank, missiles are shot from below, rotors are above, and even if somehow the rotors are COMPLETELY destroyed then the momentum would avoid it make it fall like a rock

BIS is not gona add new important simulation features because they are, either too greedy, or too lazy

agree, and i would also like to see somehow remaking the idea of MGS1 of making a super strong chopper with 3 hitpoints that deal same damage, and the chopper being able to stand up to 20 stinger missiles.

Why a MGS mod? because i think ArmA is perfect for a MGS mod, but i am drifting off topic

never said it would have to be realistic, but being able to change outfits and with underwater dimension its possible

AFAIK they just slightly illuminate or it doesn't work with NVG

ACOGs are on both US army and USMC, i dont know in what future they would replace them for just some AOGs (was that their name?)

Also, i know its not about the game, but if it takes place on the real life, MX rifles would be useless. Squared standar 6.5 rifles? that's a no, if they wanted something better they should have used the SCARs or a bullpup.

I think this issue has been fixed now that i have redone tests.

3 shots to the torso with an 5.56 to kill, 1 to the head even with helmet.

yes, this can be closed

i think just making a hit detection as a heart its fine, or making a hit detection of vital organs zones in wich FAK wont heal them, and needs a medic yes or yes

6.5 are nto new, and being new or old bullets doesnt change the penetration, while its true that 6.5 should do more damage, i think its not a good relation between 5.56 and 6.5 damage like how it should be in real life

Bez: the game DOES simulate AI thumble, but its VERY rare and almost useless, player thumble happends almost all the time.

Goose: while the image seems slef explanatory, i think it really depends on it being either caseless, using FMJ or not, etc.

Goose, AFAIK this is implemented since ArmA 2, with the ballistic things.

Bez, it seems like if you dont know too much about the contact of a 5.56 in the body, yes, i see you are a combat medic (of whatever kind of class or military branch) but i doubt a supersonic 5.56 can make a 90º turn in the shoulder and hit the brain and penetrate it. besides, i have heard of USMC that their 5.56 in the M16 (think about how the M16 deals more damage than the M4) was so weak, they had to shot 9 bullets (3 times in burst) to kill a contact in CQB (50-100 meters if i recall correctly) and even though the guy died, he lived a bunch of minutes more.

and the reason why 7.62 its so deadly its because it makes you think it explodes in the middle of the human flesh, because when you shot it to somebody it looks like a small hole, but if it penetrated to the other side you see most of the rear part blown up.

fragmentation isn't really neccessary, as its very weird for most of the bullets to break in impact.

Bez, when i say damage i mean a point in between the bullet penetration-speed-bullet weight-bullet size.

and while true, 2 5.56 to the torso should kill, remember everybody in the game is using 2035 bulletproof vest, wich is likely to be either Dragon Skin body armor or even better.

well.... i doubt an M16 can damage more than a FN FAL... but at least we agree on the ticket.

Dev. build, last days of alpha in dev build give you the pre-BETA, that's how i got it, but please dont go off topic, in real life the TAVOR may be ALMOST as precise and almost the same range as the M16A2/A4, besides having little more damage and being a small med-weight Bullpup, you would think that a new ver. in 2035 would make it lighter, with more range and accuracy and a bigger damage, just like the change between the L85A1 (unaccurate) and the L85A2 (VERY accurate)

thanks, gonna edit that

AD, what i meant its that even if they add other NATO or European armies, they are of course not gonna be here because this is barely an BETA

AD, not only that, but also, this game is in Beta, and in the Editor Flags you could see flags for most of the european countries

the WHOLE GAME video dissapeared? or just in the wasteland mod?

ill just stay here and wait until this get closed

Nice ticket name...... i also think that only 50 shots for a big giant APC its way too little

so this only affects "K", only in server-side for 1 server.... have you asked the admin about that? maybe its a special script that creates the sound when K is pressed

Unable to reproduce for me

all right, MAYBE it could be better if i could do things like rebind them to the numpad.... that thing is useless to me....

but still, i dont think the devs are gonna look at this as something very urgent, it may gonna be implemented either on relase, or with bad luck, in an post-relase patch

then i am fine

my god..... everything is bindeable but the F- keys, and its because they are 100% important, they are as important as basic movement, sometimes even more important, i dont think we should have the option to rebind them if no one is gonna do it

i explained why..... your head does not cover the whole glass of the optic, between the head and the optics there is enough room for the light to pass trough.

If we get techy, however, the optics shouldn't work with NVG on

i dont think people understand both this new 3D optics and this glare its realistic, in ArmA 2 the ACOG on the M16 was OP

then again, ITS A TRUCK, A HEAVY TRUCK

you see why 400 HP and 8 wheels have this problem?

1- low torque
2- high weight

because you are comparing a truck with a car, you just dont compare them. i think this is on purpose

oh yeah, nod, i know about that, illuminating to the frong when the lights should be illuminating the below.....

yeh, saw it too, but its not just THIS chopper, it happends to most of the helicopters in-game

not really, not in .74 at least, and dont make me start ranting about how the searchlights for any aircraft wont really illuminate

not a bug, it was just that the NATO rifleman helmet logo in the inventory and the Assassin helmet in the Opfor Recon Scout looks pretty much alike, dont know if that's intentional

i think just mirroring the animations should be enough

i dont think playing as a right handed is too much annoying, after all, in real life most of the weapons wouldn't work the same with left handed people (unlike the Steyr Aug, maybe the AK-74 and the TAVOR, wich could be used from left handed shooters) but it would be a nice touch, just like having female soldiers, either as insurgency, Op For, Blufor, or even to be able to use them as soldiers

vryoffbtdrummr, i think you haven't played alpha, the chopper was renamed PAC (or POC?) 30, just another placeholder.

brucey, your tests convinced me, indeed this is a problem.

Upvoted.

use something more than just the sound, use the marking on the grounds

No, it does not combines the apache, and vryo, TRG-20 and TRG-21 are both TAR-21, just that one of them is short barreled and the other one is long barreled.

All of your examples are from either prototypes or existing guns, so nothing in there is fictional, humans believe evolution its gonna be faster than it actually is, in the 50' people though we would be traveling to mars in 4 minutes before 1990, and barely anything changed.

Its stupid to make something fictional, add it to the game, make it somehow better than the real life version and say "Oh, ITZ BEACUZ ITZ 2035, IT GUT UPGRADED, ITZ RUEALIZTIK".

In most of the armies of the world they got plans for equipment for most of the years, or at least up to 2040 or 2030. "FUTURE" its not an excuse for fictional.

that's sad, i though BIS would care more about realism than wasting money in copyright, it was not good when they removed the seagull as spectator, but now they dont want to make vehicles or weapons named just like in real life

yes, they are, but i fear they may NOT be temporary......

KA-60 and MK14 EBR (alpha) were not placeholders, they were real, google them, however, H-9, UH-80, TRG, MX, APD, they are all placeholders, and i doubt why did they added the AH-66 (AH-99 its also a placeholder) comanche to the game, if the chopper proyect was refused at the 90's

M18 EBR it is a placeholder then, i mean name placeholder, and yes, TRG its a placeholder, MH9 is it too

"TRG-20/21" its a TAR-21, most of the helicopters....... ALL of the helicopters have placeholders names (even the UH-80 wich its just a stealth UH-60, no changed name for the variant), the green army pistol its a M1911A1, EBR is an M14, etc.

AD, arma 3 is FILLED UP with strange placeholders anyway

the AH-99 its the AH-66 comanche, not a fictional helicopter, just alike the TRG-20, maybe the MX, and the AH-9, most of the names in the game are (sadly) Placeholders

The Mi-48 and the AH-60 are completely different vehicles, and i highly doubt the apache can be used with just a gunner

i BARELY think i understood what you meant, but i think you want scopes and optics to have a better zoom, wich i think no one will agree, you can steal the marksman combat optics in infantry showcase if you want to.

the ACP its based on the M1911A1, and the bad bullet mags are a confirmed issue

mmm..... MAYBE its possible, and somehow it would be nice, to have an admin option in a server to create a mission in co-op

i dont think its THAT fast, it depends on several factors

you are jsut requesting a morea realistic damage model, wich has been requested a lot of times already

actually, i agree, we should keep trying, after all, the autor got banned/closed his account

what's the point of saying your name at the end?

Jezex:

Not the soldier the country wanted...... not the soldier the country diserved..... but the soldier, that this country needed.

still, its funny, i cant imagine to take that uphill with a loaded mortar

SERIOUSLY? HAHAHA XD SWISS BIKES WITH MORTARS?

who the fuck thought of that should be a fucking mad genious

but flying in circular patterns cost you speed

feralcircus, phisically its impossible to stay in the air without losing either altitude or speed, and yes, that would make aircraft physics SLIGHTLY more realistic (the main problem are the aircraft itselfs, not the wind dynamics)

still, the ticket its not about realistic air simulation, its about hang gliders, wich can be used without simulating the air, and no one agrees at the hang gliders

Are you a good troll? or you are 11 years old?

not golf, not hang gliders, maybe skiing for military operations (or insurgency using them) and yes, i have HEARD of black ops or spec ops using water scooters to reach places undetected in the night

keep using "Lawl"

makes you look mature

AD, zumzum thinks chopper looks like transformers because he does not understand what does a "stealth aircraft" means.

And yes, i still dislike the look of most of the aircrafts and their placeholders names, but no, they dont look like transformers, except the AH-66, wich its unrealistic, because the comanche was refused in the 99 or around that year

Ok..... hang gliders cant be added, they cant be added to "balance" because i haven't seen iranian SPECOPS deploying inserctions in hang gliders, and even then, it would be a pretty funy sight.

if you cant give us proof that it has been used by some military force around the world nowdays, then its not realistic, therefore, its not gonna make it.

dunno you, but i did found suppressors for the tavor

Akinari, what i meant its that military police are never deployed in the front, they are just a police for the military forces, or soldiers in reserve, adding military police to the game would be unrealistic and stupid, and like i stated above, i haven't seen no military cop doing anything the ticket mentions, its more of like something ANY REGULAR cop would do, and MP ain't no common cop

i haven't seen the MP doing anything of the things you mentioned in the ticket, sounds more like common police, besides, as far as i know, military police only works inside their own country, you didn't saw military police in vietnam or military police in afghanistan. (after all, the US army itself its like a police department, LOL)

i dont think its a good idea, yes, its something new, not a removal or a change, but i think people will accidentally press on "turn IR laser on" and in a nightime MP session that's most likely a suicide.

i am sorry, i still dont get it, what do you mean with script enhacement? do you want a better flashlight? or you want the binded button to "lightson/off" to work also in IR lasers?

i dont think this is a good idea, people will spent more time searching with the mouse for the action and pressing enter than just pressing a button

craters cant be done due to engine limitations, go to play minecraft if you want to make holes, and yes, i am pretty sure particles did came out from the explosions, did you had your graphics settings at max?

pretty sure you cant change format here

you dont, you wait until someone tells you

this is god damn alpha, they even confirmed suppressors and flash suppressors

Thanks, but i am not getting mad, the only reason why i want to state that is because this was already confirmed, you know, the exact same thing i said in 60% of my previous comment.

.........are you kidding, right? please tell me you are kidding, there are several houndreds of maps for arma 2 made, you just have to search for the right tool to make maps in arma

wouldn't that be being annoying just so your ticket get upvoted?

bez, i am sure you do, but mostly people like common infantry, that's why people loved OFP, 3 VERY HARD Spec ops missions that really needs pros at the game, a bunch of flying missions, armored combat missions, and infantry for the most of the time, being just 1 character and looking at his evolution trough the game from an US army private to a staff seargeant and even though its just a refference in some games, up to a company leader or the USS Keshan captain for the USMC in arma 2

AD, the problem was not the gameplay itself but the missions, secondary missions (alike Op manhattan) and things like scripts, they dont work good in a CO OP story

i'd like to have a co-op OFP campaign, nobody likes actually the spec ops campaign, not even with MP, Op Arrowhead was the BIS team trying to take one of the things that people loved from the OFP campaign, the fact that your character switches roles every mission, but nobody gets that what PLAYERS LOVED about the OFP campaign was that 90% was just you as a regular infantry and the story developed with each one of the characters in the war.

TL;DR:

I want Co-op in arma 3 only if you play as an common infantry soldier

Sorry, my lack of experience cant answer your question.

And no, literally i saw a shacktac session in wich that video just poped out on the lower right corner when everyone was fighting.

Funny as hell.

What about making your own mix and make it a "radio station" in-game?

in that case i admit my mistake, i am sorry for it and now that i see what Mumble LINK is i will agree with this ticket and upvote it.

i think there has been yet to appear a game in wich you cant use free online radio stations ever since GTA SA (more or less).

i find myself unable to link both topics anyway.

And there are addons that already let you use YT videos on the Ipod (or iphone) from ArmA 2 PMC DLC (there was a ShackTac video in wich everyone was forced to see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itvJybdcYbI)

Yes, i have. but how long has been acre around? a little bit after ACE 2 relase? before Op. Arrowhead? and yet BIS still uses the same VOIP ever since OFP.

i will just support at 100% a voice comm. mod/program/tool when they also take into account the direction of the voice (where is my mouth when speaking, incluiding speaking when looking up or down), materials in wich sound waves go thru, materials that increase Eco, incluiding world in general.

i vote down because ACRE will do the job

i dont see how scoped weapons should have more sway, and your name is "The Black Ghost".

just close this ticket, please......

"AP Rifles"

maybe in the future, nowdays a marksman rifle and an AP rifle would be pretty much the same, the MK14 EBR from the opfor its both of them at the same time