In T171344#2425784, @BIS_fnc_KK wrote:

if set velocity is part of vehicle update packet (probably is) then it will update when it updates which could be after ownership change which is immediate. Not sure what would be a good solution

This doesn't happen only with such quick scripted assembles, I was working with backpack drones recently and had them disappear twice on me during normal testing gameplay (Using Assemble from mouse wheel menu). What I've seen as client: drone appears before me for a few frames and then vanishes. When I checked its position it was very far and high away (out position probably) and falling down back to earth.

Updated repro, now properly shows bugged vehicles in the chat and puts them into fucked array.

if set velocity is part of vehicle update packet (probably is) then it will update when it updates which could be after ownership change which is immediate. Not sure what would be a good solution

The group has deletewhenempty flag set to true now. Make another ticket for that other thing with repro

Didn't check what exactly changed yet (is group deleted or has delete when empty flag set?) but I noticed that you can't get that empty group when vehicle is dissembled unless you put it into a variable. Lets expand Disassembled event handler to also include reference to the group that deleted units had?

Duplicate
See Tenshi's answer in T162334

I wonder if its possible to fix this through config without changing the model?

Revision: 150435

I guess that can be something for the future then, I will take a look when dev branch gets updated then

It's not that they haven't had time, it's that most of BI's resources are now assigned to Reforger/A4/DayZ. The people on the team who would make animations are now busy making animations for other games. The few developers left on Arma 3 are mostly code and config specialists, not the developers who can make new assets like animations.

In T171294#2425174, @Leopard20 wrote:

This needs new animation files which most likely won't happen at this stage of development.

Ideally all similar magazine detail commands should get this improvement, presumably not as main syntax for back compat but as an alt syntax.

This needs new animation files which most likely won't happen at this stage of development.

Similar problem. There is a solution?

allObject is just that all objects would be strange to call it all objects and remove some objects the engine collections already include. But what you ask is for the getter to SPECIFICALLY return out of world objects and ONLY out of world objects. I won’t add that. Using other vehicle commands on backpack you know is a vehicle makes sense, but ok, you can still do it via storing a variable on backpack.

In summary, I'm against changing existing commands to also handle one specific case of being run on backpacks. Its already possible to do everything you want with packed static\drone, just requires some tricks, this command should have made it clear and easy to do that.

In T171260#2424804, @BIS_fnc_KK wrote:

the vehicle is removed from world when it is packed I dont want to make a specific getter for asset that is not supposed to be exposed with api. The fact that it is available via variable reference was overlooked but due to back compatibility would now remain. I am actually trying to make it usable by wider user base, set/getVehicleAmmo is a good example. I can add that and god knows when I will be around that part of the code again, so if you give the list I can do it in one go

I don't get this argument what so ever, even if out vehicles aren't simulated or shouldn't be operated with some scripting commands, so what? And its not like this is arbitrary code execution level security issue, just a matter of entity being limited while hidden. Lets forbid allObjects from returning out vehicles too then, what if user deletes a vehicle from there and ends up getting an RPT error? There are already myriad of ways to break\lag\freeze\crash the game with scripting already, by the nature of modding.

the vehicle is removed from world when it is packed I dont want to make a specific getter for asset that is not supposed to be exposed with api. The fact that it is available via variable reference was overlooked but due to back compatibility would now remain. I am actually trying to make it usable by wider user base, set/getVehicleAmmo is a good example. I can add that and god knows when I will be around that part of the code again, so if you give the list I can do it in one go

Did tests for all possible combination, works properly. Shitty test code:

	if(!isNil"markers") then {{deleteMarker _x} forEach markers;}; markers = [];
	if(!isNil"objects") then {{deleteVehicle _x} forEach objects}; objects = [];
	if(!isNil"locations") then {{deleteLocation _x} forEach locations}; locations = [];
	positions = [];
	if(isNil"testgroups") then {{{deleteVehicle _x} forEach units _x; deleteGroup _x} forEach testgroups};
	testgroups = [];

Preloading the UI is a valid workaround for this bug. In my example I preloaded the UI in a display and closed that display immediately afterwards. This seems to be fast enough so the player doesn't recognize the preloading:

You can do a lots of things with a packed drone\static - repair, refuel, change weapons and magazines, get\set variables, altering a single command to have special handling case for backpacks is not the way. Returning object off backpack can also tell you if backpack was assembled before.

In fact it doesnt matter if it is unitBackpack or backpackcontainer or a variable with reference to backpack, it matters what you gonna use it for, like I said for setVehicleAmmo I can make it to look for the vehicle and rearm it. So my question stands, what other commands you want to use on backpack vehicle

Do you suggest having unitBackpack return assembled vehicle instead of backpack entity?

In T171260#2424746, @BIS_fnc_KK wrote:

Sure I can. Would this be enough?

Sure I can. Would this be enough? any other commands you want to use on assembled vehicle apart from setVehicleAmmo?

In T171260#2424744, @BIS_fnc_KK wrote:

I can make it rearm with

unitBackpack player setVehicleAmmo 1;

I can make it rearm with

Simplest application example - rearming static weapons\drones when they're in backpack form:

getBackpackVehicle unitBackpack player setVehicleAmmo 1;

What is the use case? How would this benefit wider audience?

1. Fresh mission, get backpack with player addBackpack "B_UGV_02_Demining_backpack_F"
2. Run "B_UGV_02_Demining_F" allObjects 4 => []
3. If command existed, you'd run getBackpackVehicle unitBackpack player => <NULL-object>
4. Assemble backpack
5. Disassemble the drone
6. Run "B_UGV_02_Demining_F" allObjects 4 => [2102463a040# 1781926: ugv_02_f.p3d]
7. Wear backpack off the ground
8. Now can run the new command with same getBackpackVehicle unitBackpack player expression and it should return that same vehicle 2102463a040# 1781926: ugv_02_f.p3d

When you dissemble the drone or static weapon, it doesn't get deleted but gets hidden and link to that entity is stored in the backpack, the command should return that link. When you spawn assemblable backpack it doesn't spawn associated drone\static right away but only when you assemble it the first time.

Now you lost me

In T171260#2424736, @BIS_fnc_KK wrote:

getBackpackVehicle unitBackpack player

unitBackpack is null when weapon is assembled

getBackpackVehicle unitBackpack player

I finally understood your issue.

The UI2Texture fix in the latest profiling build 2.12.150430 does not solve my problem.

I think my ticket (https://feedback.bistudio.com/T171035) is related to the behavior mentioned here. In my case it's not a nested UI but only a static image. I tested the latest profiling build 2.12.150430 but unfortunately this does not solve my variant of the problem.

Did some tests, works great!

In T171272#2424697, @kju-PvPscene wrote:

Would this also help with textures used by UI, particles or even game assets?

Like one can force preloading via config (PreloadConfig and PreloadTextures) - aka would be good to have also via mission desc.ext or scripting (best).

Would this also help with textures used by UI, particles or even game assets?

In T63451#2424617, @BIS_fnc_KK wrote:

How bad, and what is the alternative? Mind you any radical change and we gonna have a lot of people complaining about that too

How bad, and what is the alternative? Mind you any radical change and we gonna have a lot of people complaining about that too

I've seen people abuse this to skip reloading animations - drop weapon and mag on the ground and pick it back up, faster than reloading animation.

Made a ticket: T171272

all freezes on 28th, caused by st_intercept_x64.dll, whatever that is.

In T170766#2424525, @dedmen wrote:

BOOL = preloadTexture STRING

Yes. Separate ticket. And its low priority. Texture cache mess will be fun

Fun allowed then. "Can we have a scripting command to check that" was about having such texture preloading scripting command, sorry for hasty confusing replies, really happy to see this addressed.