- User Since
- Mar 6 2013, 5:51 AM (445 w, 6 d)
May 10 2016
May 9 2016
There should be a server option to kick/ban players that do more than x TK's. This would made public server way more viables.
More arcadish than ARMA 2? Have you realised that you get tired when running unlike ARMA 2 where you could sprint forever?
Happened again, it happens after changing stance most of the time. From instance switching to low crouch then moving and pressing x won't work.
Yeah it's kinda random, I had this happen with going prone too. It works fine in the editor but not while missions apparently.
My keyboard is perfectly fine thanks. Otherwise it wouldn't work when going from standing to crouching.
Already posted and this is normal. see here http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/01/brett-solomon/gear-review-eotech-xps3-2-holographic-weapons-sight/
It should read opening map in car not the opposite.
I think this is intended? In order not to have to assume the actions you took in the mission and not abuse the save system?
It makes tactical etc.. choices in the game have more weight.
NordKindchen, this is a different issue, and it doesn't do it in low standing and high standing.
Does it in high crouch as well.
I have both actually (on different computers). But more to the point I think the physic simulation might not be fully implemented yet (and is in need of lots of tweaks anyway).
PhysX is NVidia proprietary stuff, I'm not sure it's a good idea (for this particular thing anyway) as it will probably cause issues in MP where people might have AMD cards.
Sometimes it will throw nades when pressing g as well.
I'd personnally like to be able to use ctrl + wheel up and down for the sights. However it would be useful to be able to remap those yes.
I agree with the point made (but I actually do what you described with my mouse naturally when firing full auto).
It's already there.
Ahaha, first thing I tried when I saw the bell.
Hu... You reported it on the 07. I reported it on the 06. And I just wrote duplicate for helping the devs, it's not against you or anything.
Duplicate of http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=743
Also balancing issues with MP.
Related to http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=881
Same issue with the other GL.
It also sometimes starts with the second screen blackened, have to alt tab back and forth until the second screens shows up.
I'm not sure this is a problem with the dot not being bright enough. I have no problem seeing it on my end despite being colourblind, it looks like there's no dot at all on your screenshot.
On the other hand I've noticed (or maybe it's just an impression) that you go faster going downhill.
I'm not sure they presented it as stealing enemy uniforms though more as "hey you can change clothes now" I might be wrong though
I think this is intended, for obvious gameplay reasons in MP as well as because it goes against Geneva Convention.
That can already be done though, you can set nade throw to a double tap.
Maybe this is intended and ARMA 3 happens in a reality where people worship a snake god? (Just kidding)
I agree that it would be a little more intuitive if the sights were sort of centered.
Might have to do with German censorship.
Diplomacide, I highly doubt that considering you play as a british soldier in the main campaign from what we know.
Diplomacide, as explained before, the forces in ARMA 3 are NATO. Furthermore, the US lifted the ban on women on the frontlines a few months ago. It's not too far fetched then to imagine that in 2035 there would be women on the frontline.
Please stop being so US-centric.
pystub, that's a civilian, not a soldier in this video.
And yes the outfit system, that doesn't mean they'll make the outfit for soldiers or even add the animations for holding weapons. Or even the inventory system to be able to carry them. Remember how it was in arma 2.
Holy fucking shit, good job on the misogynistic and transphobic comments.
I'm not going to even bother reason with pieces of shit like you.
I'm done here.
Stephen, once again, because you didn't bother reading, as far as we know this is not the US of A in ARMA 3, this is NATO. You play as a British soldier in the main campaign.
Also this is not even true for the US anymore, the ban was lifted.
And to answer whoever said "This is a milsim, not the next instalment of Dragon Age." YEAH RIGHT BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW WOMEN ARE A THING OF FANTASY.
Jumping back to the argument that it's in "men's blood to be warriors", and that "men have always been warriors and not women", you might want to read this: http://www.kavehfarrokh.com/news/the-persian-lioness-iranian-women-in-history/
And please, stop using the stupidity of others to justify the fact that it shouldn't be implemented, if people are being idiots or making stupid mods, then don't play with them and don't use their mods.
As explained, (but since you don't read what is being said to you what's the point really...) Mods don't solve the problem due to the way mods work.
(Don't think there's a limit, the votes were registered but not being displayed)
@Tourorist, since the votes for broke 100 before the votes against I'd say there's a chance there are more votes for than against.
Edit: Apparently, it now shows more than 100 votes and it's definitely more votes for than against.
@Reiber, good job on being a sexist. This is a feature request, for something that people anticipate not to be in the final product if not requested due to the way it was treated in Arma 2. People want it in the game, therefore they made a feature request. This feature request will have no consequence whatsoever on you playing the game, you'll still be able to play as usual.
Oh and you want to know what is also one of the oldest feature request in arma? Firing from vehicles, people made a feature request about it and I don't see anyone complaining that it's an alpha and it might come later and voting against as a result. You might seriously want to look up what double standard means.
In ARMA 3, NATO is being portrayed SGTIce, the character of the main campaign is going to be British, I can easily imagine other countries being in there as well.
tOBdavian, ARMA 3 doesn't simulate the current reality, it has cars that aren't being used by any army currently and the same with weapons and other gear. It's not too far fetched to imagine that there will be more women in the future in the military.
"Oh, and just like you did me "not to insult you" and then insulting me, is still insulting." NO SHIT. You understood what I was saying, hopefully now, you understand why saying sexist shit can hurt other people too? Oh wait, no, you still don't : "Sexism? Who gives a shit."
This is just sad.
If you want me to stop resorting to the "sexism-card", you should probably stop resorting to sexism to get your point across (protip: it doesn't get your point across).
Clark, posting my answer here as well :
I don't think anyone expects women not to be in the game, what people are asking is for them to be able to actually carry a weapon and be a regular soldier in MP unlike in arma 2.
Corona2172, Ironic sexism is still sexism, deal with it. Here's let's try something, not to insult you, but you are really fucking stupid if you think you can say something sexist and not face the consequence if you say it's not to be sexist.
The mod solution isn't a solution, because of the way the clothes system is designed in arma and because of the way units work in arma. And the servers would have to have the mod enabled as well.
Once again, women in the US military serve non combat roles. This is not true for the rest of the world.
So you missed the part where it might attract a more diverse audience to the game, that some people are tired of having to play as male characters, that it's 2013 and it's maybe time the gaming community at large acknowledge that not just men play videogames.
And yeah, some games have had female main characters, how many games have male main characters? A shitload more. No one is asking that the singleplayer campaign be changed mind you.
@SGTIce there have been loads of posts explaining why female soldiers should be in game but you are visibly too daft to see them. Also please stop trying to pass as a moderator, you are not. It is not your job to say how people should express themselves here.
@Kumeda you don't have to apologize to him, he is not an authority here.
Turtle, yes, so, what's the problem with having female soldiers? Bearing in mind that it's taking place in 2035 and that they'll probably be more women in the military by then.
Rawhn, on what ground? It might not be the case for the US, but women from other countries can serve as operators.
For the sake of realism? Are you saying that France, Canada, Poland and more are not realist now? The game takes place in 2035, and from what I've understood you don't even play as the US, you play as NATO, which if I recall correctly includes those three countries.
Turtle, yes, models will probably be necessary for the clothes, however I don't think animations nor making character models will be required as previous arma featured female civilians (who couldn't bear arms). With the new clothing system, the only thing required would be uniform models and voices.
maxsil: Bullshit. Read the posts before, it's already been explained that women have fought in battles throughout history (WW2 Included), and women have died and are dying in wars nowadays. Please inform yourself before being irrespectful of the women who have died in battles and their family.
I'm not sure throwing homophobic slurs is necessary...
"and most of us teenagers would appreciate it if the Females could control themselves and avoid using derogatory remarks aimed at other testers just because you feel the need to "make your point" by way of temper tantrums."
Are you for real? You don't need to be female to be for the inclusion of female models in the game. And you seem to have missed all the arguments advanced as to why inclusion of female model is in no way unrealistic. I haven't seen any temper tantrums thrown, I have seen normal reactions to sexist remarks (like comparing women to monkeys...). And like you said, this is a feedback tracker, where you provide FEEDBACK, and the feedback on this particular point is that people want female models included in the game. If I was following your reasoning people shouldn't be requesting a stance indicator here as well because it's not a bug.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2y9CZ-bkA8 You should listen to what Canadian forces have to say about women in combat.
First of all, no one here talked about having "Femme fatale", second of all for someone who claims to be realist you do a damn great job of coming off as sexist "Also, if women characters are added to the game then I insist that they be able to come equipped with portable field kitchens in their rucksacks." How the fuck is that not sexist?
And again, what is true for the US military is not true for the French military, women are fully integrated in the military, the only exception being submarines.
I haven't seen a single report saying there were less effective or that combat was not their job, have you considered that maybe the us military is still sexist, that the cohesion bit is total bullshit and a stereotype that yourself contribute to?
Right, roughly half the people don't want to play as male, should we remove male characters altogether?
You might also want to learn about history there are lots of examples of women fighting alongside men throughout history, not only in the past but now, here's one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_Russian_and_Soviet_military
While it might not be the case for the US now, they fight alongside men in the French and Israelian army. The only exception being submarines for the french army. I don't think it's so far removed from reality to accept that in 2035 it could be the same in the US army.
Sea Eagle, the problem would be that you wouldn't able to play as female on all servers, they would have to have the mod. Which defeats the purpose. Furthermore considering how skins work now, a mod could bring issue in term of implementation when it could be solved by simply choosing in your profile and having the model be replaced depending on if you chose to be a female or male ingame. There then wouldn't have to be two sets of clothes, one set of clothes would adapt to male or female (except maybe for civilians outfits which it already does to an extent since you can't equip clothes from another faction).
I don't think anyone is asking Bohemia to rewrite the campaign with female characters here.
I seem upset? Are you suggesting that I shouldn't be upset? You compared women to monkeys and I shouldn't be upset? Your whole argument was comparing women to monkeys and you call it an argument?
Oh wow, good job naizarak, you just compared women to monkeys, I thought you left "all "sexism" aside" as you said.
Congratulation on being a sexist and misogynistic asshole.
Okay let's use your argument, let's say that you're right and 99% of the community is Male. Why is that? Does not being able to play as a female character in MP has an impact on that? I'm pretty sure some people would buy the game if they were able to play as female.
Oh right, because it's a heated issue (since some can't deal with women being treated as equal as men) let's not do anything. I'd agree with not doing if it'd cost too much or whatever, but this is seriously the worst excuse.
This should be in the game, women have been fighting in war and battles throughout history, so why not in arma.
Also for people complaining about "assholes ruining the game by running around in underwear", so somehow, if they do it with a male model, it's totally fine, but not a female model? You might want to look up what double standard means.
If the people you're playing with are immature play with someone else, the immaturity of some shouldn't be an excuse against adding female models.
Asaob, yes they have the ejecting hole because you can use ammo with cases. But since it's using caseless nothing is being ejected.
It does it more often when running with the weapon lowered and right clicking.
Clark, I don't think anyone expects women not to be in the game, what people are asking is for them to be able to actually carry a weapon and be a regular soldier in MP unlike in arma 2.
So because it might be abused (abused how?), it shouldn't be in?
If some asshole wants to screw a game up he'll find a way, female models or not. And somehow you're fine if they're running around in underwear as males. Double standards much?
While I agree that this might not be a "Major" issue, I don't understand the argument saying that we would very rarely see a female in a combat situation. Not only this is not true as there are many examples of women taking part in battles throughout history, but women are now in the military. Futhermore, the game takes place in the future, I think it's therefore reasonable to imagine that women are now fully accepted in the military.
First time I played that mission (only time actually) One of the soldier actually went all the way to the start of the mission I almost died while the "Misson Accomplished" text was showing.
Also happens with the trackIR (or any other analog lean method), if you lean a little bit.