BIS disagrees, and if we already have chopper hybrids, jew equipment on US soldiers, and US-friendly insurgency, why cant we have planes that taxi backwards?

upvoted, look at the game, do you think BIS cares about realism anymore? besides, we have no tow car

its a dupe, not the first issue to adress this, dont remember the ticket number.

True, but that doesn't mean its not an excuse.

Actually, IT IS an excuse, if he doesn't know too much english, good for him.

Blackhunter: This has been requested already..... ever since i think ArmA 1 or 2

welp, at least this is better than ArmA 2 one, and this game is not aiming for driving simulators.

i think its just fine, the grip depends on the weight, power, tires, etc. and arma cant do all that much

well.... the US army cant even afford optics for all of their soldiers either.

i still think it was better back when BIS didn't added those backseats

AD, i am not saying that they are nothing, but they are just not enough, and remember than these features, addons, and the campaign, weapons, ALL OF THEM should have been on relase, and they are being added as if the game is not fully done yet.

And Altis was using recycled buildings from ArmA 2 OA, had a lot of performance issues, and its even the half of the size of what the real counterpart is. The rain effects look great but they have no effect on the terrain, sound, or how a wet metal would look, so they are just cosmetic, and also the new rain effect is really bugged in some parts.

Can we also remove the backseats of the MH-9? it seems stupid to have an aircraft with a seating of 6 instead of 4 when a squad is 8 people

i disagree, i do believe BIS is getting lazi, i remember a part of confirmed features pre-alpha in the forums, incluiding TOH flightmodels, 3D editors, being able to pick whatever seat you want, being able to shot from passanger seat, and other bunch of stuffs more.

The reason why people thought the alpha was great was because it was not really an alpha, it was an early beta, and their opinions changed when they saw that almost nothing new was added, just 3D scopes, new rain effects, Altis, etc.

People expect big features to be incluided from Alpha to Beta, this did not happened, many confirmed features are not there, and people like me are angry because of that.

i wish they could just let us modify it, same way we could use to modify color and different variants on vehicles and maybe on units with an gear menu on the editor.

Also, i have been waiting for the actually promised and confirmed 3D editor, as the 2D editor has been giving me problems when using waypoints.

As far as i remember the AH-9 and MH-9 were not using Doors and FLIRs

All of my yes

indeed, its about not wasting money on licences. Also, this has been reported SEVERAL times.

I also posted a ticket in wich i suggested to do what EA did and explain how you dont have to pay a licence just because you are using the model and the name, because you are not using the vehicle itself.

Examples to what? to my opinion?

I think the only time i could test JSBs. at its full potential was with FlightGear.

Disliked the results.

Developers told us many things wich didn't made it, 3D mission editor, loadout editor, realistic TOH flight controls, fastropes with Physx, etc.

i am 100% sure there is no time nor resources to use that.

Also, i never trust JSBS, they try to look realistic, but at the end they are pretty arcadish.

even still, its true.

i saw this ever since the Beta version of the game

this was also seen in the main campaign mode

firing from vehicles was one of the features that were promised for arma 3.

many basic stuff that people wanted ever since arma 1 needs to be here.

And bigbigcheese: jumping is pointless

And the engine cant do much more right now

Upvoted, but there weren't warning sounds on ArmA 2, they were just with ACE2 mod.

Dowvoted:

1- not enough resources
2- no need for naval warfare
3- US army doesn't use battleships nor Carriers

ArmA 3 is dynamic when talking about ballistic, so yes, i think this is both related and a dup.

Then again, i have yet to see BIS getting the ballistics right for once

Dup of #0010135

Why? NATO doesn't need 2 vehicles that are almost the same thing.

i dont think it should be a spoiler alert as the AAF turn hostile after...... 5-10 minutes of the ingame story

voted down, unable to reproduce.

Please close this ticket, i dont know if it was the vanilla game i was using or the hotfix, but this problem is not happening anymore (still hating the showcase infantry/death valley mission because you really see how fucking unfair the AI can get)

there is no steps.

not even the dev branch, however, i am gonna reproduce this with no mods (i have light mods like resting weapons mod and the realistic firefights addons) and see if this is happening again.

you may want to see a doctor if you REALLY mean it with the ticket, i haven't seen someone get so dizzy so quickly.

still want to see more about how a friend of yours almost died because of a bug.

There is no reason to act so rude, i was calling the ticket being idiotic, not you, there is no reason to get so upset.

i dont think the game is perfect. Actually, i think this may be the weakest relase of any game BIS has done to date. its THEIR fault that they got with no money when making arma and the whole community is asking for things like an engine replacement and new features added in VBS (a good example would be the realistic simulation of the eye sight focus, so that the zoom and the TPS mode can be deleted from the game).

I was just pointing out that this ticket is not relevant, not even to the good and actual complaints about the game (and the comfirmed features that never got in, like TOH flightmodel, shoting from passanger seat, and a railgun tank).

this may be the worst and most idiot ticket i have seen after the guys asking for underwater bases, SDV with Torpedos, Dual Wielding, and Military handgliders.

and just to be honest, i have replayed the campaign, there is no spinning background besides the chopper at the start doing a 180º and going north.

"theres actually a rather funny story about a friend of mine, who almost died IRL, because of bug in arma"

my god you are one of the best trolls i have ever seen.

BIS doesn't have that much money right now.

this is not an issue unless you take ALL of the server filters off.

if you have a bad internet, its not BIS problem

It would actually be a better experience, forcing players to identify civilians, since the island of altis and stratis are *SUPPOSED* to have cities filled with civilians.

well, i am pretty sure developers are paid regardless of wether or not they work on female playermodel

well, its not like if girls NEED to have a female playermodel, but the feature would be nice, since the army is known to have a bigger female base than the marines, and since this is not middle east, having female civilians would fit the game pretty well. The problem is that some people in this ticket either says that woman playermodels are REQUIRED, wich is bullshit, and others think that having woman playermodels will somehow ruin the entire game, the playerbase, the mods, bohemia forums, the developers, the physics, the universe, your computer, and steam.

xavier, i dont play COD, but ive never seen any server 100% filled with female characters only, maybe, because unlike MMORPGS, COD doesn't has to oversexualize their own characters.

i am pretty sure no one is gonna want to be a female all the time, xavier. People always pick female characters because they play MMORPGs

Your sarcasm detector is broken, power.

oh no, i was joking with my comment, but i still agree that the game should have females. OFP had them, ArmA 1 had them, ArmA 2 had them, why not this?

"Females are also able to fulfill certain non combat roles in war, such as nurses and "entertainers" which would be nice to incorporate into the next single-player campaign story."

Dont forget the girls that suck dicks to rank up, complain to the COs when someone says a bad word, gets pregnant and takes a paid leave and stays home bragging about how strong she is for joining the army

If it would be a milsim then the reduction should be between 5% to 15%. Then again, this is not about simulating the weaker muscular bodycomplex of the females, but about just giving an option without any gameplay changes.

i dont think the arma 3 community is so fucking immature everyone would be playing as a girl, and i dont find the problem in everyone playing as a female character.

Sorry roger, but i have yet to hear why you are so much against womans in the game

I bet vertebrate could write a book about science fiction called "Missing the point"

i dont know you but i have seen womans outside xvideos, redtube, brazzers and reality kings and non-sexy womans, or womans who do a lot of physical activity, and use clothing for physical activity, dont usually show too much skin.

Even then, they could do like the male underwear, and add a small boxer and a shirt.

Peosen, you make some good points, but the underwear in arma 3 its anything but sexual in design, the same could be applied to womans, on top of that, woman soldiers dont look like supermodels or porn stars, they are not all that sexy to begin with.

On top of that, people can always just altab or quit the game and search for actual porn.

rick, i never tried to pass it off as a BIS statement

It was not exactly a quote. I was missusing them, i was speaking my mind there, but if i remember correctly i once heard a low rumor somewhere obscure (and it was the sole excuse for BIS related to female player models) is that they cant put resources in development for them.

"We dont have the resources to make a new character model, but a free modder can without using any money and just his will and time, but we cant because we spent thousands and thousands on the prize of a mod contest based on popularity"

i show pencils to every girl i see

My point was not to complain about sway and fatigue (although they are pretty bad) but that "BIS is busy on other things".

BIS is developing the game, wether they are busy on a certain thing or not it doesn't matter, this feedback works for the very game they are working on and a ticket that asks for something, even if it can be done by a mod, has the same weight as a CTD happening to half the users.

On top of that, what is BIS working on so much? they barely relase updates or even sitreps nowdays, and its not just ArmA 3, not even DayZ nor TOM has seen a lot of activity since november.

Right, i am sure they are busy adding even more sway and reducing the soldiers fatigue!

Yo, Vlad, i dont know about you, but just because "there is a mod for it" it doesn't mean we have to be softer or lazier to the devs and/or publisher.

No. What i mean is that your argument of freedom of speech is not universal. You can do and say whatever its accepted by laws both in justice and moral (although i dont agree with the latter) while its not offending anyone (and i mean OFFENDING, not "tumblr" offending)nor it lacks loigc.

I never said i thought of your comments as preaching hatred, but if every word said can be called freedom of speech we should be able to insult everyone and be as much racist as possible. Of course. However: "Your right to swing your arms ends just where the other man's nose begins"

i am not gonna get into gender equality, THTC, you can find the mod yourself, its a whole different person model with more female proportions (and someone should make different body sizes and structures for the males too)

That they are easy to add. A modder already added unoficcial woman models with ease.

"Especially with women not in Combat roles."

That is not true, womans were allowed non front lines jobs up until last year, where in the US they let them go into the front lines.

Its not important, but its not a big deal to add and it would satisfy many.

Your freedom of spech is not valid when you preach hatred or discrimination against race/gender/country/etc.

Freedom of speech is not a mastercard, it has its own limitations.

Obviously, i can see that crystal clear

Roger, do you try to make a smart comment every once in a while?

pretty much the first one

Then what are you doing here, roger? if you can, why aren't you saving people in africa?

but its not hard at all to make it, there is a modder making a WIP female playermodel that works 100% fine

Agree, but i dont think that you have to be the same one in the games as you are in real life, that's part of the fun, to be someone you are not, and its something you seem to fail to understand. And mostly my comment was because out of nowhere you started cursing and bitching like if i just won your house in a bet.

damn fantom, sorry, i didn't knew you were on your period.

yeah that would be.... OH, wait, i forgot, YOU CANT DRAG PEOPLE IN ARMA 3. Shame on BIS.

Fantom, as i remember steam does not confirm gender, and i dont think the community is so stupid it cant tell a "girl" taking advantage of her gender, and i see no problem with people playing with the opposite gender role.

Terminator, i had the idea that the ArmA community was mature and smart, please dont change that idea.

It just makes it funnier that a modder actually made a woman model in-game, and that it works just like any other BIS character (compatible with every cloth, weapon, etc.).

Many people ask me "why do you hate BIS?" and this is one of my several answers, they avoid making better things.

We can overlook things already in the game because this is supposed to be a military simulator, and if BIS cannot do something that they have done from OFP up to arma 3, then this is not something about what we need or want, its more of their problem.

Because CSAT are arabs, and most of the arabs in the middle east have the belief of the woman being a lesser person compared to mens.

And yes, childrens would make controversy, that's why they removed them (they have them on VBS3)

Echo, unless its freaking defcon 1 in the arma-verse then there will be no nuclear guns.

Child soldiers wouldn't be a bad idea for insurgency, but Greece its not africa.

isn't it forbidden to create multiple accounts to vote up tickets?

Renegade, either you read too fast or you barely saw any comment, because you cant read all of them in 3 minutes.

Rick: the reason why kids are not added (unlike VBS) is because this game has to be sold to the public, AKA going past rating controls, AKA, moral judgement, and its not a good idea to put underaged people in the game if you can kill them

Now that's an interesting point. But you are putting politeness and education over real life.

really? stopping from playing a game just because there were girls in it?

Let me be honest. The reason why i disagree is because i dont think this is a waste of resources. If we can remove things we can live without on arma just to put priority on the important matters, I would have requested for no underwater world, realistic PiP 3D scopes, not so much of realistic graphics, better sound, realistic and modern enviroment and equipment, 1:1 size scale of Altis-Lemnos and Stratis (A3) - Stratis (real life) And removed the option to change clothes, wich i found useless.

But, BIS may not think some of these features are a waste of resources, and if a modder could in a few months make a female character model for A3 wich so far has been proven bugless and BIS-quality, it makes female characters not so much of a resource waste after all.

Actually, why do we have asians faces for the soldiers? they are just faces, isn't that a waste of resources too?

Doctor, nobody said this should be against fixing issues. The feedback tracker and suggestions are there not to replace the bug reports, but instead to add suggestions to make the game better. If you think this should be downvoted just because its not a high priority, you are wrong.

Roger: you are REALLY into that idea, aren't you? i think you can heavily mod ArmA 3 to make it use the Sims interface

Shadowmaster: BIS knew modders can do their job so they said "fuck off" and did nothing.

What about watching TV?

womans cant make food, you just send her to buy it before you cut her arm off.

Roger, i never said that you were against female characters, i also think they are important, but you forgot about the sex slaves too!

"However you've got to ask yourself, if you're spending all that time to modify, create or play a game with the opposite sex modelled, why not go out in life and socialize with the real thing using a whole lot less energy?"

AFAIK that is a short for "why creating assets for games when you can have it in real life?"

Roger, using your logic then there wouldn't be no games at all.

Well, instagoat, either you are a nazi feminist or you just cant take a sexist joke....

Also, yes, i haven't thought of that, in the campaign the place is not a warzone, so it makes sense for there to be second line and support womans soldiers.

that's what i meant with "nazi feminist"

there aint no single smart male (or dumb male) being a feminist.

why not making a hitbox for the tits? and minigames like "Who shot the more tits?"

implying people dont want female models to have tits as big as lara croft

Female models are just models, they can use recycled animations, the only thing should be to check wich animation glitches through the tits of the womans and fix them as extra animations that don't glitch.

should be easy to work out.

now i get it.

Also, in TOH you had bigger maps, and there was a true fastrope with physx support.

agree with nod, what do you mean with tech?

well, DayZ SA rain droplets looks awful, but yeah, supposedly DayZ is using a modified ArmA 2 engine, while this is a brand new engine.... it doesn't show.

You know something is wrong when their most important game saga is worse than an run-out-of-the-mill marketing game for money.