Same here my framerate drops dramatically in multiplayer.

Win7 64bits
I5 3570k
HD7850
8GB DDR3 1600

Well you still could. You may have to answer for your immature behaviour though.

Well another reason to up vote the idea then?

What this community has come to? Thanks Obama I guess or should I say DayZ...

Or just add an option to hide server messages... This has always been a pain in the ass and not only in Arma games.

I had a very fine game on Iron Front not so long ago when the game was really cheap on Steam. However I finally left half mad because during the whole game the left side of my screen was clustered with a constant flow of server messages with people connecting, connected, disconnecting, kicked by battleeye ect... ect... in a bold red police!

I love BIS and their games, but that engine of theirs is in more than one way an instrument of torture...

Would be nice if you could at least change the camo of your weapons and attachments on the fly indeed. I just tested Christian.1987's Mp7 pack, and while it looks great the ammo box has near a dozen variants of the same weapon but with different camos. It kinda defeat the purpose of the new inventory.

How about no...

Indeed those suppressors have been obsolete for a long while and certainly won't be around in two decades from now... In a perfect world ArmaIII would simulate both supersonic and subsonic ammo with and without suppressors, sounds, effects and physics wise. I don't see this coming though.

Ok, I see. You got my vote anyway.

Funny to see people bringing up BF3 at every turn while there are much older games and highly respected tactical shooters that successfully featured suppression effects such as Darkest Hour and Project Reality.

I saw people doing the same on BIS forums when some people rightfully complained that you cannot switch to your sidearm without stopping.

I wouldn't be surprised if many fake accounts were used to downvote this as maturity isn't a quality among these people. Gotta remember that guy who had created a hundred accounts to downvote a poll, whether ArmaIII should use Steamworks or not, on BIS forums.

In Darkest Hour, mod for Red Orchestra Osfront, the suppression effects were pretty goat... You really did shit you pants under MG fire.

Not sure why there are so much dislikes. I have a bad case of tl&dr though... xD

You need to put tags into that ticket if you want people to find it and vote Devil_Inside. I accidently created a duplicate, while I actually spent some time searching for a corresponding ticket beforehand.

http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=10509

Anyway +1, you got my vote. That's something that has been bothering me as well especially on Wasteland servers.

I totally agree with that and am surprised there aren't more people voting this up as it's always been a pain in the ass...

All it would take is an option to hide server messages in game options. Please...

I do agree grenade launchers and forward handgrips need to be independant attachements just like optics. Moreover it would pave the way for modders to easily offer new attachements such as under barrel shotguns ect..

There are many features more deserving of being included in the game. Modders can eventually add females faces for the handful of people who will use them. Many demanded features which could actually enhance our gaming experience are out of modders' league, BIS should focus on those.

I wouldn't be surprised if most of the votes for or against this ticket came from who knows how many fake accounts. Maybe BIS should use the Steam authentification tool for their tracker, it sure would help in some cases.

@MaJoR Mole

"no need to bother anymore with vehicules and carburant: western soldier is the solution. Charge them with all the stuff and let them run. Maybe they can also push heavy armor to make substantial costs saves on the carburant?"

That got to be the stupidiest comment I've read so far, and only proves how ignorant and blind you people are. This discussion is going nowhere...

I'm sure BIS devs will do whatever is best for them and the game. Although I wish people would stop spamming the tracker with non issues and duplicates. Creating hundreds of fake accounts to thumb up this isn't gonna help either, people tried this on BIS forums and just got banned.

ArmAIII's issue tracker is a gigantic embarrassment compared to the ArmaII community issue tracker. I didn't believe those old BI forum users when they were saying that the DayZ and Steam crowd could only ruin this game. I guess they weren't totally wrong...

At the end of the day you kids are irrevelant anyway. I'm not wasting any more of my breath, it's pointless here.

@Kumeda

Yeah but women aren't smarter nor dumber than men and there are plenty of male candidates. So yeah, it only boils down to politics not pragmatism.

Anyway this whole "debate" was about women in the army and combat roles. Not pilots or sailors. Carrying that kind of weight isn't uncommon in the infantry. Actually people carrying mortars, LMGs or HMGs are used to much more.

The lack of lucidity among feminists and their whiteknights is astonishing... Meanwhile in the real world, the main reason there are so many women in the military to begin with is because of affirmative action, quotas and lower physical standards for female recruits.

They wouldn't recruit women for anything but nursing if western governments weren't forcing their military to put women everywhere. And not because of sexism but because men always come out on top in term of physical feats.

Western Soldiers can carry more than 50kg of equipment for kilometers in Afghanistan. Good luck for the average fit 70kg woman with much lower bone and muscle density than men to carry that kind of weight for hours without breaking her back after a single tour.

Feminist lobbies in the US are pushing laws so women may be allowed in combat roles and base physical requirements for men dumbed down to the current level for women in the military. We'll see in the next quagmire US forces step in, if it was worth it. All the extra casualties that will result from lesser combat effectiveness, just to please feminist lobbies that put their agenda before soldiers live.

Here what a woman soldier has to say...

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/27/some-advice-on-women-in-combat-from-a-female-veteran/

@LadyBrecky

Stop playing the little victim already... That's what kids do, I thought you were a strong proud woman?

As for people harassing your, I merely see some rare trolls and some people actually trying to put some sense into you. You've only been answering with ad hominem attacks so far. How about arguments?

@Zombo

The only European countries that have been waging war lately are Britain and France, and I know for a fact that it does apply there as well. Knowing Europe, it's same to say it's the same for the other countries on the continent with the exception of Scandinavian countries maybe.

Actually I had the chance to discuss with a French NCO who trains young soldiers in the 28th Signal Regiment. He talked to me about the differences between male/female recruits and how difficult it was to train women.

@Zombo

Every single country does have lower physical standards for women. They don't pass the same tests for recruitment and later during basic training. They are even speaking of lowering the bar for men in the US to align with women performances. You should check your facts before calling people ignorant, you and your feminist friends sometimes really sound mentally challenged or just unable to accept reality.

Women won't ever surpass fellow male soldiers in term of stamina. That's why male athletes don't ever compete against women.

It makes sense to have women in DayZ because it's a post apocalyptic world. That's all...

You're getting told over and over and yet you persist with arguments only showing strong ignorance and stubbornness. You'll have to do better than calling people sexists and ignorant.

This is beyond stupidity... You're actually asking BIS to spend countless hours and ressources to animate and adapt all the gear to female characters. While they could actually make the game better and hopefully bugfree.

Very few armies allow women in combat roles for the simple reason women soldiers are much weaker, smaller and overall less resistant than men. It's biological facts, just deal with it.

Every single army out there do not hold the same standards for men and women training because it's simply not possible unless you lower the bar for men as well. This gets soldiers killed on the field...

The issue with feminist activist is that they are unable to put reason before ideology. They are the big barrier to the emancipation of men and women in our societies. Just stop calling anyone sexist because they are not ignorant and blind to the biological differences between men and women.

Yeah, it should be the bare minimum to have favorites in any server browser imo.

The new crosshair is actually much more realistic than the old one...

Since OFP you could easily hit something hundreds of metres away just by zooming on the crosshair. It didn't make sense to aim down sight in most situations with the crosshair on, which was utter bullshit.

Be aware that in ArmaIII your gun is "floating" between the four lines of the crosshair, so you never know the exact direction of your barrel unlike in previous Arma games. In ArmaIII the crosshair is only useful in CQC as it should be... It would be stupid to come back to the old crosshair.

Same here my framerate drops dramatically in multiplayer.

Win7 64bits
I5 3570k
HD7850
8GB DDR3 1600

Please no... When I go outside, although I live in western continental Europe we do have sunny days, my eyes don't start hurting like they do playing ArmaII with the sun in my face. That effect was totally overdone and poorly simulated how human eyes work. People don't go blind whenever they look East in the morning...