User Details
- User Since
- Mar 12 2013, 6:19 AM (599 w, 4 d)
May 10 2016
Yep not enought zombies on the map coz most of them are invisible, one tried to take my soul, rotten kiwi saved me...
some servers don't have 3Rd person ON
May 9 2016
I played arma2 a lot and weapon feeling was bad, and i like it better in arma3. The game is much harder to aim and takes a lot a pratice compare to others games including arma2. The only way to shot something full auto is to be proned or the target to be at 10meters. Combat is very good and nice the way it is now, but we don't have a lot a weapon so maybe it will change after the release.
I guess maybe i just enjoy ppl missing me at 10 meters.
Exactly Surge72.
Plz don't change anything, the game is fucking hard to aim, and i fucking love it, first time a need time to master aim control in a game. Seriously recoil is good, aim must be 100% from the player and not some shitty cod auto center aim shit. Don't listen to the sad ppl.
I don't have the issue.
ati 6870hd
2600k at 4.2ghz
windows 7 64 bit
4g ram
custom settings : all on high, no AA, 1.5k distance overall, 1k object, 50m shadows.
server 64 slots full.
So this is what i noticed :
-when im in woods (so i don't see very far) my gpu is a 100% usage 40-50 fps.
-when im on a hilltop 40 fps gpu usage close to 50-70%.
-i run from woods to hilltop and my gpu would slowly go down but my fps are about the same.
-when inside a car or a house gpu usage 50% at 30 fps.
So i have about the same fps without the same gpu usage.
Sometimes my fps would be stuck at 30 with 50% gpu usage anywhere, i disconnect and leave the game. Restart it play on the same server again and it would be fine again.
cpu is fine, 4 cores used at around 40-50%, core 0 is the most used tho.
the game is very playable for me, i wanted to change gpu for it but maybe not :D
it's a lot better for me than arma2.
and less fps in the city too but this is normal so...