- User Since
- Sep 13 2013, 1:14 PM (396 w, 5 d)
May 10 2016
i think evrebody can agree this game still needs optimization and improvement on a lot of different hardware.Never said it was a bad game.Loved arma 2,love this one but it needs more patches.So devs please listen to the community and improve it.
From dwardens response 1.The only thing to know if the server is ok is to play on it when there are more people to properly test it.An empty server works great with no problems.In cities fps drops as well and when A.I. is around.Depends on so much these fps drops.At least to reduce the factors that are causing this.Even by 5-10 fps.It makes a difference in this game those 10 fps.
i do understand them.i just think they would have known all of this from alpha and beta and could have done something about it.at least i know i am at the same level as people with even higher end pcs.
noticed that 2.it still depends on server.regardless of what i choose on a lot of servers the fps is the same.i tried your server johnnie and no improvement
first of all:you are not helping in any way.
secondly:if you are happy to play a multiplayer fps in 2013 at 6 fps good for you.nobody else is happy about an engine using just 1 of your i5,i7,6 core,8core amd processor.no difference between 30 and 60?go read benchmarks about diference between 30 and 60 in any game out there including this one.I post this so the devs can see it is a problem and maybe, i hope they will fix it in a patch.mi rig is more then enough to play any game out there decently and get 60 fps on low settings at least and this game shouldn't be an exception to that.
btw:when i said max 30 fps i mean rarely as hell it goes up to 30.usually around 20
tried them.no improvement.On 2 servers the fps was playable even jumped to 50.One was wasteland at night.Don't know if that was the case.But 8 other were just unplayable with changing any setting.