1. Use a target wearing PASGT. Shoot at it with the AK-74.

• V1.3.0.84: Actor receives roughly 36% health damage;
• V1.2: actor receives roughly 39% health damage.

2. Use a target wearing 6B2. Shoot at it with the M16A2

• V1.3.0.84: actor receives roughly 57% health damage;
• V1.2: actor receives roughly 37% health damage.

3. Use a target wearing the 6B2 and shoot front and back of the armour

• V1.3.84: the actor receives identical health damage;
• V1.2: the actor receives less damage to the front, more damage to the back presumably simulating the difference in ballistic protection.

My assumption here is that the PASGT is modelled in Reforger as a singular kevlar material, whereas the 6B2 is titanium zone + underlying kevlar on the front with only kevlar on the back.

So it seems like the PASGT is performing similarly to the current live version of the game, whereas the 6B2 is performing noticeably worse.

This leads me to believe that the 6B2's titanium plate is not calculating intended armour resistance. However, if you shoot the 6b2 at an oblique angle, it still offers deflective properties, so it doesn't appear to be the case that the titanium plate is non-existent in the calculations.

All shots to the target are placed centre of the breast or between the shoulder blades on the back.