I am absolutely supportive of alternative "emotional arguments" and would embrace a payment in form of free update support, and social business models instead of the before mentioned 1,99$
But only if we keep it at emotional arguments on all sides.
Dean Hall is using examples, that would translate to: "If I made a Mission and sold it with the entire Arma 3 Game, you should have a 75% cut of my income" I would be ok with that, but only if you did not need to buy Arma 3 in order play the mod.
If you for any reason can not come up with a System, that let's our money reach the actual modders, can you please remove my name from the supporter credits? That would be quite an embarracing situation for me, thank you.