Page MenuHomeFeedback Tracker

CSAT armor tougher than NATO
New, WishlistPublic

Description

I agree with a lot of folks that the CSAT faction should be tougher, before the last update they were pushovers, their armor was sub par at best even with a tactical vest to support it. After this last update ive noticed CSAT are FAR tougher to kill. Both in King of the Hill, it can take a while 5.56 magazine to the chest easily.

The best example other than that is that I literally have watched about 3 times the scenario in the menu with the Blufor and Opfor fighting at Kamino Blufor has been wiped out without exception every time. The most ive seen is the Opfor troops in the center get reduced to a single soldier and still win against both groups. The only thing I can assume is the new armor system, fantastic work on that by the way, best system you could have thought of, they are some kind of tough.

Now to my question. Is this correct? Or is this something overlooked?

Details

Legacy ID
479950601
Severity
None
Resolution
Open
Reproducibility
Sometimes
Category
Balancing
Steps To Reproduce

Either use the above two examples or simply put a group of Opfor and Blufor together in the editor, seems to be quite consistant.

Additional Information

The scenario that plays on the menu seems to be Blufor with 6.5 MX's vs Opfor with 6.5 Katiba's, decent caliber rifles, both about evenly matched but Blufor, which is supposedly better equipped with chest armor, goes down with a minute or so.

Event Timeline

Overcast edited Steps To Reproduce. (Show Details)Dec 15 2015, 4:48 AM
Overcast edited Additional Information. (Show Details)
Overcast set Category to Balancing.
Overcast set Reproducibility to Sometimes.
Overcast set Severity to None.
Overcast set Resolution to Open.
Overcast set Legacy ID to 479950601.May 8 2016, 1:19 PM