Page MenuHomeFeedback Tracker

Incorrect armour ratings for US Vest, SF Vest (TLBV) and Vest (Airborne)
New, NormalPublic

Description

The US Vest, which consists only of a PASGT armour vest, apparently offers zero ballistic or explosive protection.

Meanwhile, the Vest (M16 + M203) (Airborne), which consists only of an unarmoured load-bearing vest, apparently offers a moderate amount of ballistic and explosive protection. Similarly, the SF Vest (TLBV), which is also a load-bearing rig without any visible armour, has a ballistic protection rating similar to the vanilla Raven bulletproof vest.

It's unclear whether these are issues with the Arsenal protection rating display, or whether the actual armour values of these vests are wrong.

Details

Severity
Minor
Resolution
Open
Reproducibility
Always
Operating System
Windows 10 x64
Category
Personal Protection Armor
Steps To Reproduce

Select the following CSLA items in the Arsenal and compare their listed protection ratings to their visual model:

Vest
Vest (M16 + M203) (Airborne)
SF Vest (TLBV)

Event Timeline

NikkoJT created this task.Jun 24 2021, 10:03 PM

In CSLA 1.1, a new retexture of the Vest was added which has a believable armour rating. However, the original Vest (now Vest (M81)) still apparently offers no armour. The other vests mentioned here still have incorrect armour ratings too.