Change Details

I propose an alternate syntax for the scripting command LBSetSelected, where for the row parameter you can supply an array of rows to change their selected state. LBSelected returns an array of rows which are currently selected, being able to provide this array into LBSetSelected immediately would be a handy addition, rather than having to iterate over the array deselecting each row given. Currently ``` { _ctrl LBSetSelected[ _x, false ]; }foreach LBSelected _ctrl; ``` Proposed ``` _ctrl LBSetSelected[ LBSeleted _ctrl, false ]; ``` Maybe also allow -1 as the row to deselect/select **all** as per the way LBSetCurSel works.

I propose an alternate syntax for the scripting command LBSetSelected, where for the row parameter you can supply an array of rows to change their selected state. LBSelected returns an array of rows which are currently selected, being able to provide this array into LBSetSelected immediately would be a handy addition, rather than having to iterate over the array deselecting each row given. Currently ``` { _ctrl LBSetSelected[ _x, false ]; }foreach LBSelected _ctrl; ``` Proposed ``` _ctrl LBSetSelected[ LBSeleted _ctrl, false ]; ``` Maybe also allow -1 as the row to deselect/select **all** similar to the way LBSetCurSel works.

I propose an alternate syntax for the scripting command LBSetSelected, where for the row parameter you can supply an array of rows to change their selected state. LBSelected returns an array of rows which are currently selected, being able to provide this array into LBSetSelected immediately would be a handy addition, rather than having to iterate over the array deselecting each row given. Currently ``` { _ctrl LBSetSelected[ _x, false ]; }foreach LBSelected _ctrl; ``` Proposed ``` _ctrl LBSetSelected[ LBSeleted _ctrl, false ]; ``` Maybe also allow -1 as the row to deselect/select **all** as persimilar to the way LBSetCurSel works.